Skip to content

Eva Joly : “En France et en Europe, en 2017, la solidarité est un délit”

Eva Joly : “I Frankrig og i Europa, i 2017, er solidaritet en forbrydelse.”

Eva Joly : “En France et en Europe, en 2017, la solidarité est un délit”

EuroÉcolos
Offentliggjort den 13. sep. 2017
ABONNER 58
Intervention d’Eva Joly à l’occasion du débat sur les évolutions récentes dans le domaine de la migration en présence de la vice-présidente de la Commission et haute représentante de l’Union pour les affaires étrangères et la politique de sécurité Federica Mogherini.
Kategori
Nyheder og politik
Licens

https://www.google.dk/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=8&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwjumqXizrDWAhUIM5oKHQKnBCwQtwIIOzAH&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DaSQzdh4Q_0M&usg=AFQjCNH7f0Iq9euOXRJV4rKR88yGs3Peuw

Advertisements

“there must be something behind this story,”

Bloomberg, 18. september 2017

QUOTE: Talk about money down the drain.

Swiss prosecutors are trying to figure out why someone apparently attempted to flush tens of thousands of euros down the toilet at a Geneva branch of UBS Group AG. END OF QUOTE

SOURCE:

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2017-09-18/geneva-police-confiscate-euro-bills-clogging-up-toilets

DANE STAYING IN THE USA INDICTED WITH GROSS FRAUD IS PROTECTED BY A NAMEBAN

A Dane staying in the USA and a former employee at Danish tax were on September 8, 2017 indicted with gross fraud amounting to 37,4 million DKK.

According to a release issued on September 8 by Danish Serious Fraud Office (SØIK) the Dane, who is living in the USA, is protected by a name ban.

The former employee at Danish tax is furthermore indicted with malfeasance.

According to the indictment he accepted bribes more than 40 times. The bribes amount to more than 2 million DKK.

The criminal case is a fraction of an investigation, that has been going on since Danish tax reported alleged dividend stripping for billions to SØIK in 2015.

Since the scandal started, the amount of billions in this case has had to be increased several times, from 6 to 9 billion to at this moment 12,3 billion DKK.

The actual charge concerns a foreign company. In 2007 this company in 14 cases unjustifiably had Danish dividend tax refunded. This amounted to more than 37 million DKK.

The Danish man, who is living in the USA is the owner of the company, that according to the indictment gave untrue information to Danish tax.

The untrue information was approved by the former employee at Danish tax as responsible officer in charge.

According to the press release from SØIK, the Danish prosecution is protecting the indicted Dane living in the USA with a ban against mentioning his name.

On the other hand anyone in Denmark that care to know, is aware of the identity of the ageing former employee at Danish tax, as he participated as source in a documentary produced and broadcasted by Danish Television (DR).

At an early stage in the case about dividend stripping amounting to 12,3 billion DKK, Danish daily Politiken also told its readers, that the ageing former employee at Danish tax has a young Russian wife with ‘controversial business relations’.

The former employee at Danish tax is living in Sweden but close to Denmark. This means that both indicted persons in this case are Danish expatriates.

The criminal case against the two charged men is going to take place at the Court in Glostrup, a suburb to Copenhagen. The criminal case has not yet been put on schedule.

—– —– —–

QUESTIONS:

Why doesn’t the press release from SØIK mention what arguments the prosecution has presented for maintaining a name ban concerning the Dane living in USA?

What year was the man born?

What is the name of the Danish American’s company at the center of this actual charge?

Where is the company registered?

What year was it established?

What kind of company is it?

Was it a shell company or were real business activities taking place at this company?

Who is counsel for the defendant concerning the Dane living in the USA?

Did the indicted Dane living in the US come to Denmark in May this year at his own free will?

After Danish Stein Bagger was convicted to 7 years in prison in the grand fraud case centered around IT Factory years ago, it emerged, that Stein Bagger was fully able to run a company from his prison cell.

Has the Danish American in this case full access to computer and the web while being kept custody?

If yes, is this reasonable?

— — —

SOURCE:

http://www.anklagemyndigheden.dk/nyheder/Sider/skattesagen-tidligere-skatteansat-tiltalt-for-millionsvindel.aspx
— — —

NOTABENE: All items posted at this blog are based on open sources.

OG HAR DU PENGE, SÅ KAN DU FÅ…

Et fly betalt med penge fra svindel for 1,2 milliarder kroner i Holland blev i 2011 beslaglagt af Politiets Sporingsgruppe.
Det skete efter anmodning fra de hollandske myndigheder.
Flyet, der er af typen Beechcraft turboprop 1900D, var under ombygning i en hangar i Nordjylland, da politiet dukkede op. Det moderne forretningsfly havde plads til 18 passagerer.
Beslaglæggelsen af flyet blev for seks år siden omtalt i dagbladet Politiken. DR Nyheder har beskæftiget sig med samme sag tidligere i år.
Michael Ejlerskov, der er leder af politiets sporingsgruppe udtalte da til DR Nyheder, at der var mange praktiske udfordringer med flyet. ”Skulle vi lade flyet bygge færdigt? Og hvad med hangarleje? Motorerne skulle startes en gang om ugen, ellers røg fabriksgarantien. Der var meget bøvl omkring det, og der skulle tages stilling til mange ting. Men til sidst blev flyet fløjet til Holland, hvor myndigheder overtog det og solgte flyet,” sagde Michael Ejlerskov.
Når et fly er af typen ’Beechcraft turboprop’ betyder det, at flyet både er udstyret med turbiner og propeller.
— — —

SPØRGSMÅL:

Hvad skulle svindlerne bruge flyet til?

Hvad handlede den ombygning af flyet, der var i gang i den nordjyske hangar om?

Hvad for en hollandsk svindelsag havde finansieret flyet?

Hvor meget indbragte flyet, da det blev solgt?

THE SO CALLED PROJECT MONEY TRANSFER AND THE DANISH EXPATRIATE LIVING IN THE USA

DR NEWS, QUOTE: According to documents in the case the Danish expatriate was caught in a control, when Danish Tax in 2010 gets access to documents about a great cluster of money transfers from tax havens to Danish bank accounts in connection with the so called project ‘Money Transfer’. END OF QUOTE

QUESTIONS:

How many money transfers from tax havens to Danish bank accounts does this discovery from 2010 concern?

What tax havens are involved?

How many Danish bank accounts are involved?

In what banks?

To whom do the bank accounts belong?

How much money had been transferred altogether?

Are there more news items for reporters to get hold of if scrutinizing project Money Transfer more closely?

SOURCE:

http://dr.dk/nyheder/penge/skattesvindel-millioner-sigtede-har-kendt-hinanden-i-over-30-aar

DIVIDEND STRIPPING: A DANISH EXPATRIATE FROM THE USA, ”TWO AMERICANS” SANJAY SHAH FROM DUBAI AND SVEN FROM HELSINGBORG IN SWEDEN

A Danish expatriate staying in the USA was arrested in Copenhagen Airport on May 23 this year.
Danish Tax discovered irregularities in the Danish expatriate’s tax matters during a tax control in 2010.
At that time the man had recently moved to the USA.
During the following years the man did not turn up to the many meetings about his case. Instead he explained himself through his lawyer.

This according to two news items published by DR News on June 21.

A few weeks later, on July 10, DR News reported, that Danish Serious Fraud Office (SØIK) had charged two in the USA with dividend stripping.
This time the talk is about the great Danish case of dividend stripping:
”British Sanjay Shah is no longer the sole main suspect in the case about fraud amounting to 12,4 billion via dividend stripping.”

According to DR News the charges concern ”two Americans”, who are supposed to be the kingpins in the fraud case together with the 46 year old British Sanjay Shah, who is staying in Dubai, and who until then had been the main suspect of this sase.

All three men are charged with fraud of a particularly gross kind in the great case about dividend stripping.
Danish expatriate Sven, who is staying in Helsingborg in Sweden and used to work for Danish Tax in Høje Taastrup is charged with fraud in both the minor and the great case about dividend stripping.
— — —
QUESTIONS CONCERNING THE DANISH EXPATRIATE, WHO WAS REVEALED BY
DANISH TAX IN 2010:

At what time did he land in Copenhagen Airport on May 23 this year?

How old is he?

What is his education? How was he trained?

Where in the USA did he stay?

Where did the man stay before he moved to the USA?

What was he doing then?

— — —

BACKGROUND:
DR NEWS, JUNE 21, 2017

QUOTE: The Danish expatriate is also charged and kept in custody in the case. He is living in the USA but was arrested in Copenhagen Airport on May 23. END OF QUOTE

JUNE 21, 2017

QUOTE: According to documents in the case the Danish expatriate was caught in a control, when Danish Tax in 2010 got access to data about a great cluster of money transfers from tax havens to Danish bank accounts in connection with the so called project ‘Money Transfer’.
At that moment the man had recently moved to the USA, and during the following years he did not turn up to the many meetings about his case, but delivered the explanation about winning in poker through his lawyer.” END OF QUOTE

DR News JULY 10, 2017

Danish Serious Fraud Office (SØIK) is charging two in the USA with dividend stripping
British Sanjay Shah is no longer the sole main suspect in the case about dividend stripping amounting to 12,4 billion.

QUOTE: DR News has learned that Danish Serious Fraud Office is charging two Americans with being kingpins in the fraud case together with 46 year old British Sanjay Shah, who is staying in Dubai, and who until this moment was the main suspect in the case. END OF QUOTE

TINY INDICATIONS

This summer Danish lawyer Jakob Lund Poulsen stopped as Sanjay Shah’s council for the defendant. Sanjay Shah is, as many will already be aware, the until recently sole main suspect in a case about 12,3 billion DKK being siphoned away from Danish tax. As of late he has been accompanied by two Americans who are also charged with gross fraud.
It has also been noticed that DR News removed two photos of Sanjay Shah from a big item on the web, alas without explaining to the public why this step was needed?
Nevertheless, there are tiny indications that the masonry surrounding British financier Sanjay Shah is cracking, aren’t there? / UD